Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Sorrowful cycle of every Professional Computer Chess Player

Author: Graham Laight

Date: 11:26:08 12/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 1999 at 12:18:51, Fernando Villegas wrote:

>I suspect that human intelligence is only partially related to the mass of
>neurons it has in his brain. Without a minimum certainly it would not be capable
>of being what it is, but once that a minimal mass is granted, what matters is
>relations and the quality of relations, the "program". In a recent discovery
>about the brain of Einstein, it follows that his superiority was not related to
>the total mass of it -in fact it was less heavy than average brains- but in the
>specific richness of a tiny zone of his brain that has a tiny fraction of
>neurons. And even there I tend to believe that Einstein was Einsteien due not to
>that, but to the way he used that little portion of his brain. The patterns, the
>way you see the world, the algorythms of your thinking are the clue. That's
>reason of differences in the way of thinking of each man respect to any other
>man AND of the category that each specific kind of thinking has in certain field
>compared with others.
>Fernando

Anyone know what Einstein's IQ was?

Having said that, IQ tests are known to have cultural bias - but it would be
interesting to know anyway.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.