Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Sorrowful cycle of every Professional Computer Chess Player

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 13:55:41 12/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 1999 at 14:26:08, Graham Laight wrote:

>On December 22, 1999 at 12:18:51, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>
>>I suspect that human intelligence is only partially related to the mass of
>>neurons it has in his brain. Without a minimum certainly it would not be capable
>>of being what it is, but once that a minimal mass is granted, what matters is
>>relations and the quality of relations, the "program". In a recent discovery
>>about the brain of Einstein, it follows that his superiority was not related to
>>the total mass of it -in fact it was less heavy than average brains- but in the
>>specific richness of a tiny zone of his brain that has a tiny fraction of
>>neurons. And even there I tend to believe that Einstein was Einsteien due not to
>>that, but to the way he used that little portion of his brain. The patterns, the
>>way you see the world, the algorythms of your thinking are the clue. That's
>>reason of differences in the way of thinking of each man respect to any other
>>man AND of the category that each specific kind of thinking has in certain field
>>compared with others.
>>Fernando
>
>Anyone know what Einstein's IQ was?
>
>Having said that, IQ tests are known to have cultural bias - but it would be
>interesting to know anyway.


If my memory serves me well, Einstein was IQ 205....
Another historical IQ according to some studies:
Napoleon: 140
Goethe: 180
Washington: 145
Darwin: 135 !!!! (high but less than some people here...)

Fernando



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.