Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Tiger - Is It Really 2696 ELO?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:55:34 12/23/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 23, 1999 at 06:05:10, Graham Laight wrote:

>On December 22, 1999 at 21:42:53, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>>  hmm Strange that a man of Science such as yourself would go on "feeling" and
>>>no facts. Schredder 4 just got finish Drawing Karpov at 40/2, so they could very
>>>well be near 2700, although I doubt it. By the way what is your rating? I would
>>>like to know how much chess knowledge is behind these  "feelings"
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I had a provisional rating of just over 2200.  But that was provisional.  I
>>never played in the needed 24 games.  I have played a FM on ICC (used to play
>>him pretty regularly) and generally broke even with him.  I'd guess he was
>>really a 2000-2100 FIDE player as he was not playing much tournament chess
>>when he was on ICC.
>>
>>I have a pretty good 'feeling' about the game.  And a lot of my 'feelings'
>>about how computers play come from both personal observation, plus lots of
>>discussion with players _far_ stronger than I am, a couple of them being GMs
>>and a couple more being active IM players...
>>
>>As far as going on 'feeling' and not 'fact' that is simply wrong.  I haven't
>>seen any great results by computers against GM players at 40/2.  Drawing Karpov
>>is not bad.  But he is a long way from a 2700 player today...  Once I see that
>
>After all these years of reading Bob's posts, I've finally caught him making an
>ill-informed comment! Karpov's rating IS 2700. Follow the link below to see the
>official FIDE ratings:
>


He has a 2700 rating... which has been steadily dropping the last few years.
He doesn't play anywhere near as well as he did 15 years ago...





>http://www.worldfide.com/fide/html/top100men.html
>
>Just goes to show - even the best of us have our off days...
>


Only goes to show that it takes a while for a rating to drop, particularly if
you don't play in a lot of tournaments/games.  :)



>-g
>
>>programs do play evenly with GM players at 40/2, my estimate will change.  But
>>not until...
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2700 is an incredibly high
>>>>rating, better than all but maybe 10 players.  I don't believe a computer
>>>>other than Deep Blue has a prayer of playing at that level, on any hardware
>>>>forseeable for the next 5 years, assuming the PC platform.
>>>>
>>>>Rebel has almost hit 2500 against GM and IM players.  to get to 2700 would
>>>>require a herculean effort.  IE it would have to win 3 games for every loss
>>>>vs 2500 players, which seems impossible at present...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.