Author: John Warfield
Date: 23:10:37 12/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 1999 at 18:59:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 26, 1999 at 18:33:42, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>I'm not sure what to make of it, and yes i'm sorry if attempts at definitions >>have been given before. I have rebel century and it has an option called "Tiger >>system" Is this Pure Chess tiger? > >it is ed's rebel with a special switch in the search algo that was maybe >taken from tiger. so an idea from christophe in rebel. > > >> If so what version? I have tiger dos and i >>know it's tiger. Now on the rebel page i see this line >>" REBEL-TIGER is STRONG and according to the SSDF the strongest one you can get >>on your PC. For the complete list check out the REBEL-TIGER Hall of Fame " > >>Now it APPEARS by this statement that here Rebel-tiger is being equated with >>Tiger 12.0 is this the case? Or is This just shilly shally salesmanship? > >tiger-dos is not sold. tiger-dos is a TEXT-engine without graphics board. >how shall ed or christophe sell a TEXT-engine ??? If Tiger 12 dos is a text engine, How was it tested by ssdf? Manually?? > >therefore they made a joint venture between Rebel/Christophes Tiger/Loka-Soft... >and the result is: > >in the user interface of chesspartner christophes program (12.0 version) >and later, there will be also a kind of rebel in the chesspartner >user-interface. >so in fact 3 programs will share their forces and bring out a program. > > >>Anyways my chess collection bursts at the seems, All i need to complete it, is >>Ferret(Though my clone rules!), and tiger 12 in the partner interface(Dos sucks) > >anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.