Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:06:41 12/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 1999 at 02:10:37, John Warfield wrote:
>On December 26, 1999 at 18:59:33, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On December 26, 1999 at 18:33:42, Charles Unruh wrote:
>>
>>>I'm not sure what to make of it, and yes i'm sorry if attempts at definitions
>>>have been given before. I have rebel century and it has an option called "Tiger
>>>system" Is this Pure Chess tiger?
>>
>>it is ed's rebel with a special switch in the search algo that was maybe
>>taken from tiger. so an idea from christophe in rebel.
>>
>>
>>> If so what version? I have tiger dos and i
>>>know it's tiger. Now on the rebel page i see this line
>>>" REBEL-TIGER is STRONG and according to the SSDF the strongest one you can get
>>>on your PC. For the complete list check out the REBEL-TIGER Hall of Fame "
>>
>>>Now it APPEARS by this statement that here Rebel-tiger is being equated with
>>>Tiger 12.0 is this the case? Or is This just shilly shally salesmanship?
>>
>>tiger-dos is not sold. tiger-dos is a TEXT-engine without graphics board.
>>how shall ed or christophe sell a TEXT-engine ???
>
>
> If Tiger 12 dos is a text engine, How was it tested by ssdf? Manually??
Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS has an Auto232 interface.
You don't need a graphical interface to play automatically thru Auto232.
Christophe
>>therefore they made a joint venture between Rebel/Christophes Tiger/Loka-Soft...
>>and the result is:
>>
>>in the user interface of chesspartner christophes program (12.0 version)
>>and later, there will be also a kind of rebel in the chesspartner
>>user-interface.
>>so in fact 3 programs will share their forces and bring out a program.
>>
>>
>>>Anyways my chess collection bursts at the seems, All i need to complete it, is
>>>Ferret(Though my clone rules!), and tiger 12 in the partner interface(Dos sucks)
>>
>>anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.