Author: CLiebert
Date: 09:08:56 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2000 at 11:04:57, blass uri wrote: >On January 01, 2000 at 09:17:06, CLiebert wrote: > >>Fritz6X running the gauntlet >> >>Time: 10'/40 + 10'/40 +5'. >>240 games. >> >>Dual PII-450 >>128 MB hash, >>with permanent brain >>each engine uses its own cpu > >I am interested to know if programs lost some games on time in your tournament. No one lost on time! > >I think 128 MB is too much hash tables for part of the programs who needs time >to do something with the hash tables between moves. Could be right. > >I saw that Junior6 lost on time some blitz games that I downloaded(probably >because the tester gave it big hash tables) > >I guess that giving programs only 32 MB(hiarcs7.32 is an exception because it >does not suffer from big hash tables) is better > >Maybe 32 MB is also too much for your time control. > >Uri Most of my blitzgames I play with 16 mb ram. Seems to be a good compromise. Chr.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.