Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 1st game: Diep2 vs. Rebel-Tiger12

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 08:05:48 01/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 09, 2000 at 10:52:02, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:

>Really! :)

>Look, Vincent, I already answered to this in another post. With the parameters
>in the ct.ini file that Chrsitophe recommends for Rebel-Tiger 12.0e, Tiger picks
>e5. After 1.e4 and with the old parameters, it picks d5 from ply 9 on, 13'',
>without switching to e5. That explains it, doesn't it? By the way, these
>parameters are recommended for all games played by Tiger, not only for this
>match.
>
>What's wrong with double checking moves one by one? That it is physically
>impossible to recheck all moves in 40 games, so you better believe in the good
>faith of the whole thing. Besides, the purpose of this match was to prove that
>Tiger's evals "suck" and that it wins because of the book. Now, if it wins
>without a book as it did, how can we describe the evaluation functions of the
>program that loses to Tiger?
>
>Enrique

Calm down guys.

it was only 1 game so far.
not the end of the world.

and diep is not a weak program.

maybe i have done something wrong with the special book
vincent has sent me. i don't know. he/we will find out.
and when anything is ok for vincent we can continue or even start again.
i do not want to disadvantage anyone.

one should imagine that it should not be that difficult to setup
a program accurate enough, but it seems it is not that easy to
configure some programs.
e.g. when i ask for advice concerning winboard programs
i get 4 different advices asking 4 different persons.
so this is not 2 "trivial".
also whenever one program loses, you get normally massive complains
by the programmer of the program that has lost.
that seems to be normal.
normal human reaction i would call this.

i am open for anything.
i am not doing this for believing 100% in 100% deterministic
universe beeing tarrasch/descartes alike person.

i do not believe in a determinstic universe, but in a quantum-universe.
so i am sure human point of view is the right point of view and
that we will find a way solving anything to make anything
confident.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.