Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:52:02 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 10:30:32, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On January 09, 2000 at 10:26:20, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On January 09, 2000 at 10:17:58, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2000 at 09:52:57, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On January 09, 2000 at 09:47:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 09, 2000 at 09:43:21, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>No. Without opening book and after 1.e4 Tiger picks: >>>>>> >>>>>>Ply 1 Nf6 >>>>>>Ply 3 d5 >>>>>>Ply 3 e6 >>>>>>Ply 5 e5 >>>>>>Ply 8 d5 >>>>>>Ply 12 e6 >>>>>>Ply 13 e5 >>>>>> >>>>>>Enrique >>>>> >>>>>good that you confirm enrique. so it is on my machine too. >>>>>good. >>>> >>>>Any time. :) >>>> >>>>If it happened, it happened. This need to confirm is ridiculous. Imagine if you >>>>have to replay every game... The 40 games you play are already quite something, >>>>no? >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>But diep plays without book now and with a 9 ply search or something >>>you won't play the opening good! >> >>Well... At least Diep played 5 or 6 moves in book and Tiger none... >> >>In any case, Diep should play with the book it is supposed to use, but this >>checking of Tiger moves is unnecessary. > >what's wrong with that? >Tiger plays everywhere in the world 1..d5 but what was sent to thorsten >plays opening a lot better suddenly. it's tuned for playing without book >there! Really! :) Look, Vincent, I already answered to this in another post. With the parameters in the ct.ini file that Chrsitophe recommends for Rebel-Tiger 12.0e, Tiger picks e5. After 1.e4 and with the old parameters, it picks d5 from ply 9 on, 13'', without switching to e5. That explains it, doesn't it? By the way, these parameters are recommended for all games played by Tiger, not only for this match. What's wrong with double checking moves one by one? That it is physically impossible to recheck all moves in 40 games, so you better believe in the good faith of the whole thing. Besides, the purpose of this match was to prove that Tiger's evals "suck" and that it wins because of the book. Now, if it wins without a book as it did, how can we describe the evaluation functions of the program that loses to Tiger? Enrique >>Enrique
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.