Author: blass uri
Date: 10:41:31 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 08:44:34, Thorsten Czub wrote: >[Event "Diep vs. Rebel-Tiger match"] >[Site "k6-400 40/120"] >[Date "2000.01.09"] >[Round "1"] >[White "Diep2"] >[Black "Rebel-Tiger12"] >[Result "0-1"] >[TimeControl "40/7200"] > >1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 d5 5. Nxe5 Bd6 6. Nd2 Bxe5 7. dxe5 >Nc5 8. Be2 O-O 9. Nf3 Ne4 10. O-O Nc6 11. c4 d4 12. Bd3 Nc5 13. Bg5 Qe8 14. >Re1 h6 15. Bf4 Be6 16. Bb1 Rd8 17. a3 a5 18. b3 Bg4 19. h3 Bxf3 20. Qxf3 d3 >21. Qg3 Qe6 22. Ra2 f5 23. Qe3 Rd4 24. Rd1 g5 25. Bh2 f4 26. Qe1 Rf5 27. >Qc3 Rxe5 28. Kh1 d2 29. Bg1 Re1 30. Rdxd2 0-1 > >more games (39) will follow later... I am interested to know if tiger won by better positional understanding or by outsearching diep. when did diep understand that tiger has a better position? If it was one move or two moves after tiger understood that it is better then it is probably a win because of deeper search and otherwise it is probably a win because of better evaluation function. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.