Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 16:48:15 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 13:41:31, blass uri wrote: >On January 09, 2000 at 08:44:34, Thorsten Czub wrote: thorsten, just post the logfile of DIEP! >>[Event "Diep vs. Rebel-Tiger match"] >>[Site "k6-400 40/120"] >>[Date "2000.01.09"] >>[Round "1"] >>[White "Diep2"] >>[Black "Rebel-Tiger12"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[TimeControl "40/7200"] >> >>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 d5 5. Nxe5 Bd6 6. Nd2 Bxe5 7. dxe5 >>Nc5 8. Be2 O-O 9. Nf3 Ne4 10. O-O Nc6 11. c4 d4 12. Bd3 Nc5 13. Bg5 Qe8 14. >>Re1 h6 15. Bf4 Be6 16. Bb1 Rd8 17. a3 a5 18. b3 Bg4 19. h3 Bxf3 20. Qxf3 d3 >>21. Qg3 Qe6 22. Ra2 f5 23. Qe3 Rd4 24. Rd1 g5 25. Bh2 f4 26. Qe1 Rf5 27. >>Qc3 Rxe5 28. Kh1 d2 29. Bg1 Re1 30. Rdxd2 0-1 >> >>more games (39) will follow later... > >I am interested to know if tiger won by better positional understanding or by >outsearching diep. > >when did diep understand that tiger has a better position? > >If it was one move or two moves after tiger understood that it is better then it >is probably a win because of deeper search and otherwise it is probably a win >because of better evaluation function. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.