Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anand comment about Deep Blue

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:18:34 01/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 13, 2000 at 10:32:02, blass uri wrote:

>On January 13, 2000 at 10:21:16, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 12, 2000 at 15:25:18, Rajendran Ramachandran wrote:
>>
>>>On January 12, 2000 at 14:45:13, Rajen Gupta wrote:
>>>
>>>>from the atrocious results of rebel vs grandmasters it is pretty clear that once
>>>>humans get the feel of playing against computers or even a particular computer,
>>>>they (ie humans)would get the better of computers.It is a fact that kasparov had
>>>>no opportunity at all to evaluate deep blue while the reverse was not true.In
>>>>all fairness kasparov should have been allowed a couple of weeks with deep
>>>>blue-he would have identified the holes and blasted through them-just as the
>>>>humans are now doing to rebel
>>>>
>>>>rajen gupta
>>>
>>>Well said rajen
>>>
>>>A complete list of games as a database of kasparov's games would have been
>>>available to the computer for determining the style, weakness etc..
>>>
>>>raj
>>
>>
>>This is wrong.  Did not Kasparov play completely different openings in the
>>match than he played in prior tournaments?  Did he not try some anti-computer
>>stuff by taking DB out of book quickly with bizarre moves?  So he can totally
>>change his style of play so that old games are useless, while DB has to (a)
>>provide old games and then (b) play exactly like it did in those old games?
>>
>>He got some atrocious advice for how to prepare for Deep Blue.  He used the
>>wrong training approach, using a micro and thinking it was teaching him how
>>DB would play.  He played openings he was unfamiliar with which put him into
>>new territory against an opponent _very good_ in unfamiliar territory.  It was
>>error on top of error.
>
>I disagree that it was an error to get deeper blue out of book as soon as
>possible.
>
>Kasparov got better positions in most of the games against deeper blue.
>kasparov lost against deeper blue only in the games he followed theory.
>
>a micro does not play the same moves as deeper blue but it is the best opponent
>he could train against before the match.
>
>kasparov won in the first game when deeper blue did typical micro mistakes.
>
>Uri


I think that in Game 1, DB was only a hair away from winning.  A couple of
early moves by the queen and bishop looked a bit awkward, but even GM Joel
Benjamin never thought black was in any serious trouble for the first 30
moves...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.