Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:48:42 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2000 at 11:37:03, Albert Silver wrote: >I never said he was unproductive, I said these threads he started are >unproductive. You announced his new forum and I went there and saw the >predominant theme: CCC sucks! Hardly an auspicious beginning if it's all about >computer chess and NOT about CCC. IMO CCC or an opinion from a founder of ccc IS about computerchess. What else is it ?? >I agree. He started the forum and can write what he pleases, but doing so he >also sets the tone. I saw the tone, and it looked like it was an excuse to >gather an audience to hear him rant about CCC. I dearly hope I'm wrong, but this >is what I was greeted with, and these were the conclusions it led me to. we will see how it develops. its easy to say you see REASONS when only a few people (me and chris) have posted so far and there is not much traffic. there have to be some beginning posts. so - i guess the TONE as you call it will change automatically. so as the tone in rgcc has changed. :-) >So the answer is to wait for others to write about computer chess? The answer is to wait to give it a chance. what you do is critics on first impression. give it a chance in a few weeks. thanks. >*sigh* If this is just some pissing contest, count me out. When I am civil with >someone, I expect that courtesy to be reciprocal. :-))) you wanted it :-)) now you got it clear to you...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.