Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 04:16:44 01/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2000 at 05:44:04, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 15, 2000 at 04:36:16, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On January 15, 2000 at 02:58:59, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On January 15, 2000 at 01:07:27, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On January 15, 2000 at 00:38:37, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 14, 2000 at 23:20:13, Tina Long wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>This next Moderator nominations & elections is a very dodgy issue. How >>>>>>improbable is it that we could get 2 or 3 "Sean's" as validly elected >>>>>>moderators? >>>>> >>>>>It is not a lot of fun to do, and it takes a lot of time, if you cruise the >>>>>posts rather than just waiting for complaint email. It's also a huge challenge, >>>>>and that can be something that some may find rewarding. >>>>> >>>>>We have to find good people who will do this or the group will have problems. >>>>> >>>>>I think the odds that we will get imposters as moderators are not very high. I >>>>>am more worried that we will end up with people who really aren't up to the job >>>>>for one reason or another, or have a bizarre agenda that will make CCC less >>>>>usable than it already is. >>>>> >>>>>bruce >>>> >>>>Hope you will be one of the next moderaters. >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>>Thanks. I want to avoid this because I don't want people to think I'm trying to >>>take over. I would like to see someone who has done it before do it again this >>>time, for instance Amir, Peter, or Enrique, amongst those who are still here. >>> >>>bruce >> >>I have had no trouble with the current moderators. >> >>My ratings as I see them of the three >> >>1. Bruce, usually answers just about all my moderator emails I send, and does a >>pretty good job so far. >> >>2. Karinsdad, never seen him do much, but from a few posts I think also does his >>job well, and does allot behind the scenes. Likes to stay in the background and >>out of trouble. >> >>3. Dann, Apart from am email today which I complainted about the new Sean >>CM7000_GM person, has said very little in the forum that the other moderators, I >>think need to take a bit of a more public stand on being a moderator, After >>Fernando quit, for a few months I did not even know Dann was even a moderator. >> >>All the I would have no problem vitong for again. To me Bruce seems best at >>handling things, KD becomes emotional on occasions I think, but not a big >>problem. And Dann is in awe of Bruce's power and Reputation, that he does not >>come into the for more, >After one year of effort, I deserve better. At any rate, I won't do it again >this year. Dann you did a fine job, but Bruce and KD seemed to be more public in CCC, which gives the impression that you are doing less, which maybe nowhere near correct, but I am giving my rating of you guys. If you gave the impression more that you took the bull by the horns, then I would have rated you higher. Moderators are voted by how we think and see them in CCC. Since Bruce and KD made more public statements about issues and you made less then it gives the impression of doing less. If all three of you did not post about issues in the forum, then I would have rated you by who replied to my complaint emails the best. As is, Bruce replied to about 98% of my complaints. So I give him my highest marks. in both email and forum responses. Bruce did do most of the "Moderation - Knock it off" posts when things got out of hand, whereas you and KD, I cannot recall one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.