Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:37:51 01/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2000 at 07:16:44, Michael Cummings wrote: [snip] >Dann you did a fine job, but Bruce and KD seemed to be more public in CCC, which >gives the impression that you are doing less, which maybe nowhere near correct, >but I am giving my rating of you guys. >> Perhaps it is because one of my goals is that moderation should be invisible. << >If you gave the impression more that you took the bull by the horns, then I >would have rated you higher. Moderators are voted by how we think and see them >in CCC. >> Bruce was the most effective because of his previous experience. I don't hold him (or any other human) in awe. I have deep respect for his intelligence and ability, but that's not awe. << >Since Bruce and KD made more public statements about issues and you made less >then it gives the impression of doing less. If all three of you did not post >about issues in the forum, then I would have rated you by who replied to my >complaint emails the best. As is, Bruce replied to about 98% of my complaints. >So I give him my highest marks. in both email and forum responses. >> Well, we are all certainly entitled to opinions. And I probably was the least effective of the three moderators (for that matter). << >Bruce did do most of the "Moderation - Knock it off" posts when things got out >of hand, whereas you and KD, I cannot recall one. >> I think that is just an impression of yours. I'll bet if you go back and count them, they are about evenly divided. <<
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.