Author: blass uri
Date: 07:58:37 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 10:16:25, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 26, 2000 at 01:42:21, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Enrigues tournament and some other fresh tournaments shows, that 1) Shredder's >>win at WCCC was by luck and 2) Chess Tiger isn't better than Chessbase engines. >> >>So no revolution yet. >> >>Jouni > >Thats nonsense. > >1. it was not luck that shredder won or IS champion ! >saying this is forgetting that at this time, when championship >happened, fritz and junior and even tiger was weaker. > >2. it is not true that tiger isn't better than chessbase. >christophe has increased playing strength. >the problem with tiger is, that the program version used now is not born >to win swiss tournament due to the fact that it plays to passive and often >gives away a point of half-point. >but - this changes when you play a match with it (40/120). > >I have no idea what enrique is doing. but i am sure that tiger >is not weaker. How can you be sure about it? You did not test fritz6.68 and you did not have enough time to test Junior6a. I am not saying that tiger is weaker but I cannot be sure about nothing when I have not enough data. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.