Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: I will no longer respond to DR Hyatt

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 22:04:23 01/27/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 27, 2000 at 21:32:07, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 27, 2000 at 21:18:05, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>[snip]
>{regarding DB support}:
>>This is an unforgivable sin here or anywhere else.  I think it quite funny
>>that (a) folks wonder why Hsu doesn't post here;  and then (b) attack anything
>>they do as inferior.
>>
>>I have said this before...  They are far better than anybody (other than maybe
>>myself and a couple of others) give them credit for.  Just continue to watch
>>the analysis of the DB logs.  We suddenly discover that (a) they are searching
>>a lot deeper than some kept thinking;  (b) their branching factor is actually
>>not much worse than the rest of us;  (c) etc.
>>
>>Best to wait and watch.  Lots more will come out over time...  But the
>>naysayers will _never_ be silenced...
>
>I find it very puzzling the huge amount of absolute hostility towards Deep Blue
>[and HERE of all places]!
>
>The last match was 1997.  That's about 3 years ago, and we still talk about it
>almost daily.  Nothing comes even remotely close to being as interesting as the
>Deep Blue match.  Nothing has ever generated the publicity for computer chess
>like the Deep Blue match.
>
>And yet people are clearly *angry* at the Deep Blue team.  Is there some sort of
>history that would explain it?  I keep feeling that I have walked late into a
>movie and everyone is panning the hero, who seems like such a nice guy.
>
>Most amazing of all are the sort of persons who are irate.  Almost always
>incredibly intelligent computer science types.
>
>*boggle*


First, everyone wants _their_ favorite micro program to be #1.  That
won't happen.

Second, nobody wants to see a big iron machine do well.  they want the machine
they can afford to come out on top.  That won't happen either, for at least
another 10 years.  I saw this reaction to Cray Blitz, to Belle, to Nuchess/Chess
4.x, deep thought, hitech and deep blue.

Third, 'university types' seem to not be in vogue with many.  Many would prefer
if a 'everyday person' were delivering the best chess performance.  You can
sense a little bit of "anti-academia" most anywhere...

Who knows what other issues are involved...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.