Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What would be the rating ... no answer?

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 00:52:06 02/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 01, 2000 at 02:57:01, Bertil Eklund wrote:

>On February 01, 2000 at 01:15:04, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On February 01, 2000 at 00:59:31, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On January 31, 2000 at 10:13:16, Harald Faber wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 30, 2000 at 13:36:38, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>-  Games   Won  Oppo
>>>>>                                           ------  ---   --- -----   ---  ----
>>>>>   1 Junior 6.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2706   38   -35   403   70%  2556
>>>>>   2 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2682   37   -35   414   67%  2555
>>>>>   3 Nimzo 7.32  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2661   36   -34   420   68%  2530
>>>>>   4 Fritz 5.32  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2659   34   -32   474   65%  2548
>>>>>   5 Junior 5.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2629   35   -33   438   63%  2532
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Compared to Chess Tiger 12.0   Junior 6.0 has 24 more points. Part
>>>>>of this difference has been gained due to Chess Tigers tendency
>>>>>to repeatedly lose against Junior 6.0 in the same opening.
>>>>>Hopefully the opening books and the learners will be improved
>>>>>in the future so that these phenomenon disappears.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>... for Junior 6 and Tiger 12 if one subtracts the double/similar games?
>>>
>>>
>>>I wanted to ask too, but I didn't dare...
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>>
>>Of course not, you are the concerned programmer, I am only a non-well reputated
>>chess player and computer chess program user, I am allowed to ask such questions
>>(although I wonder why many people don't answer but ask another question to me).
>>:-)
>>
>>However, I would really like to know the number. Weren't it 12 double games?
>
>Hi!
>
>I guess 5-10 points down respective up, if Tiger scored normal 4-5 points out of
>eleven (with black)
>
>Bertil

OK, that is only guessing. If it were 15 each then Tiger would be back on top
again...

However, Tiger is still not the superior program some betatesters wanted to make
us believe...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.