Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 03:39:45 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 03:52:06, Harald Faber wrote: >However, Tiger is still not the superior program some betatesters wanted to make >us believe... As far as I can tell, nobody wanted you to believe anything. Results were results and Tiger's were very good in matches played by beta testers and by the SSDF. That's why it topped the SSDF list, isn't it? It was not a ploy as you make it sound. Four months have passed since the beta testers matches and new programs arrived in the meantime. Still, Tiger is very strong, #2 at the SSDF and not far at all from the top. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.