Author: Tina Long
Date: 21:52:11 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 20:52:15, Michael Cummings wrote:
>On February 01, 2000 at 20:41:25, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>
>>I assume this means P90 as the CM6K was played on 200 mmx.
>>And therefore you also conclude the CM6K to be approx 100 SSDF
>>points stronger than the CM5K which was tested on a P90.
>>Thanks.
>
>What I should say is that CM6K would be stronger if they played it on P90
No you shouldn't say that at all.
And you have selectively ignored part of Chessfun's post, that you believe CM6k
is 100 points stronger than CM5k!?
26 Chess Tiger 11.8 Pentium 90 MHz 2483 50 -49 202 54% 2455
....
44 Chessmaster 5000 Pentium 90 MHz 2387 49 -45 240 67% 2262
Your case does rest on that you know.
Play some games & show us your proof, or get a new, more interesting, drum to
bang. : > {
Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.