Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 17:52:15 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 20:41:25, Chessfun wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 18:38:07, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On February 01, 2000 at 12:02:29, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2000 at 01:01:33, Michael Cummings wrote: >>> >>>>On February 01, 2000 at 00:45:41, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 31, 2000 at 17:37:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Why doesn't someone send a suggestion to the Chessmaster folks, asking them to >>>>>>include an autoplayer? (Or *better yet* Winboard capability)?? >>>>>> >>>>>>It seems that lots of people would like to see it tested. Why burden the poor >>>>>>SSDF testers, when the existance of an autoplayer or Winboard compatibility >>>>>>would remove the problem? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Why do the same threads get repeated again and again each time a new SSDF list >>>>>is out, in almost the same words? >>>>> >>>>>It gets boring. :) >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, Michael Cummings. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Christophe >>>> >>>>Your Welcome Christophe :) >>>> >>>>I think they get repeated cause I see the power of the Chess Engine as being the >>>>ultimate. Johann is a master Chess programmer (if not the best :-) >>>> >>>>Until CM6K or sadly CM7K is tested and the results show that the others are >>>>better when using the faster hardware, I will keep on beating the King Engines >>>>drum :) BOOM BANG BOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> >>>>:-) >>>> >>>>I will continue to fight for the equal rights of all computer chess programs, A >>>>fair system for all is what we all want in the end to find the best of the best. >>>> >>>>I must fight for TRUTH, JUSTICE & THE AUSTRALIAN WAY !!!!! >>> >>> >>>Your point about CM6000 is now completely outdated. >>> >>>You should realize that the real number 1 is Chess Tiger 11.8. It tops the P90 >>>list with a huge margin, other competitors are far behind. >>> >>>Your CM6000 leads the P200MMX by only 1 point... Ridiculous! >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>Having a quick look over the SSDF list, I do not see CM6000 ever played on a P90 >>Computer, so thus the discussion continues, I think you would find that CM6K >>would lead if they had played it on the 200MMX !!!!! > > >I assume this means P90 as the CM6K was played on 200 mmx. >And therefore you also conclude the CM6K to be approx 100 SSDF >points stronger than the CM5K which was tested on a P90. >Thanks. What I should say is that CM6K would be stronger if they played it on P90
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.