Author: Chessfun
Date: 17:41:25 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 18:38:07, Michael Cummings wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 12:02:29, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On February 01, 2000 at 01:01:33, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2000 at 00:45:41, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On January 31, 2000 at 17:37:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>Why doesn't someone send a suggestion to the Chessmaster folks, asking them to >>>>>include an autoplayer? (Or *better yet* Winboard capability)?? >>>>> >>>>>It seems that lots of people would like to see it tested. Why burden the poor >>>>>SSDF testers, when the existance of an autoplayer or Winboard compatibility >>>>>would remove the problem? >>>> >>>> >>>>Why do the same threads get repeated again and again each time a new SSDF list >>>>is out, in almost the same words? >>>> >>>>It gets boring. :) >>>> >>>>Thanks, Michael Cummings. >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>>Your Welcome Christophe :) >>> >>>I think they get repeated cause I see the power of the Chess Engine as being the >>>ultimate. Johann is a master Chess programmer (if not the best :-) >>> >>>Until CM6K or sadly CM7K is tested and the results show that the others are >>>better when using the faster hardware, I will keep on beating the King Engines >>>drum :) BOOM BANG BOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> >>>:-) >>> >>>I will continue to fight for the equal rights of all computer chess programs, A >>>fair system for all is what we all want in the end to find the best of the best. >>> >>>I must fight for TRUTH, JUSTICE & THE AUSTRALIAN WAY !!!!! >> >> >>Your point about CM6000 is now completely outdated. >> >>You should realize that the real number 1 is Chess Tiger 11.8. It tops the P90 >>list with a huge margin, other competitors are far behind. >> >>Your CM6000 leads the P200MMX by only 1 point... Ridiculous! >> >> >> Christophe > >Having a quick look over the SSDF list, I do not see CM6000 ever played on a P90 >Computer, so thus the discussion continues, I think you would find that CM6K >would lead if they had played it on the 200MMX !!!!! I assume this means P90 as the CM6K was played on 200 mmx. And therefore you also conclude the CM6K to be approx 100 SSDF points stronger than the CM5K which was tested on a P90. Thanks. >I suppose they need to play Chess Tiger on the 200MMX computers to see if it is >way ahead of the rest.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.