Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 21:49:07 02/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2000 at 00:31:28, Peter W. Gillgasch wrote: [snip] >In any case you should look into this for obvious reasons... I'm not sure that it bears too much inspection. Certainly it should be checked and if it can be improved, then it should be improved. However... 1. The correct move was found in 1.6 seconds. When the time limit expired for that move it would certainly make the correct choice. (I had it set on 16:40). 2. The version with this defect just won a major contest, so it may not be all that serious. In fact, maybe the other programs should strive for that behavior. Or not -- who knows... ;-) But it would be logical to check and see if something can make an improvement.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.