Author: Chessdaddy
Date: 20:02:17 02/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2000 at 21:05:35, Michael Neish wrote: >On February 13, 2000 at 17:48:35, John Kilkenny wrote: > >>On February 13, 2000 at 17:42:24, Bradley Woodward wrote: >> >>>On February 13, 2000 at 16:55:12, John Kilkenny wrote: > >> No attack, Just answr the question dude. His name is brought up because he >>is the most ardent supporter of the anti comp GM campaign. Also in the minds of >>many, he holds sway over the minds of the uneducated bretheren of chess. We >>fight for the release of those minds :). > >This is new information for me. Which anti-comp campaign are you >referring to, and what are its objectives? > >Ironic though, that the author of one of the strongest programs >around, who's worked for so many years in this field, is (you say) >involved in an anti-computer campaign. > >At any rate, one game at these fast time controls proves nothing. >Don't you think it's more sensible to be cautious before sounding >the bell? > >Cheers, > >Mike. There has been more than two games played, See Chris Carson's list of 40\2 games where computers have a rating over 2500.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.