Author: blass uri
Date: 15:35:43 02/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2000 at 18:12:30, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On February 16, 2000 at 18:07:45, blass uri wrote: > >>On February 16, 2000 at 17:49:59, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2000 at 17:25:09, Amir Ban wrote: >>> >>>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:43:12, Amir Ban wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:06:03, Amir Ban wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>This game is not over. There are major communication problems at the >>>>>>KasparovChess offices. The game has been stopped, and there are discussions >>>>>>going on on what to do next. >>>>>> >>>>>>Needless to say, this is not making me happy. Apologies to all viewers. >>>>>> >>>>>>Amir >>>>> >>>>>It has been agreed with GM Adams to call game one a DRAW. >>>>> >>>>>The second game will start in about 20 minutes. Communication looks good at this >>>>>moment. Let's hope we can play the second game to finish :( >>>>> >>>>>Amir >>>> >>>>GM Adams has now changed his mind and wants the entire 2-game match to be >>>>declared his win by forfeit. >>> >>>Who is accepting so much crap from Adams? He lost game 1 and that's all there is >>>to it. >>> >>>Enrique >> >>If the time trouble in game 1 was because of a communication problem then I >>agree that adams lost game 1 but if the time trouble of Junior was because of a >>bug in Junior when it used a lot of time for move 29 then the fair result of >>game one is not clear. >> >>I understood from another post that the fact that Junior had less than 2 minutes >>to finish the game was because of a bug in Junior. > >Bugs hurt programs, they are not an unfair advantage by any means, and bug or no >bug Junior won the game. I do not understand it. How did Junior win the game? Adams did not resign. If Junior had lost because of a bug, I can't imagine >that Adams would gentlemanly concede to replay it. I did not suggest to replay a game because of a bug but only because of communication problems and communication probnlems is not a bug. It is a case when a third side is responsible for the problem(not adams and not Junior) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.