Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 15:12:30 02/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2000 at 18:07:45, blass uri wrote: >On February 16, 2000 at 17:49:59, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On February 16, 2000 at 17:25:09, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:43:12, Amir Ban wrote: >>> >>>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:06:03, Amir Ban wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>This game is not over. There are major communication problems at the >>>>>KasparovChess offices. The game has been stopped, and there are discussions >>>>>going on on what to do next. >>>>> >>>>>Needless to say, this is not making me happy. Apologies to all viewers. >>>>> >>>>>Amir >>>> >>>>It has been agreed with GM Adams to call game one a DRAW. >>>> >>>>The second game will start in about 20 minutes. Communication looks good at this >>>>moment. Let's hope we can play the second game to finish :( >>>> >>>>Amir >>> >>>GM Adams has now changed his mind and wants the entire 2-game match to be >>>declared his win by forfeit. >> >>Who is accepting so much crap from Adams? He lost game 1 and that's all there is >>to it. >> >>Enrique > >If the time trouble in game 1 was because of a communication problem then I >agree that adams lost game 1 but if the time trouble of Junior was because of a >bug in Junior when it used a lot of time for move 29 then the fair result of >game one is not clear. > >I understood from another post that the fact that Junior had less than 2 minutes >to finish the game was because of a bug in Junior. Bugs hurt programs, they are not an unfair advantage by any means, and bug or no bug Junior won the game. If Junior had lost because of a bug, I can't imagine that Adams would gentlemanly concede to replay it. Enrique >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.