Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:02:36 02/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2000 at 17:55:20, Howard Exner wrote: >On February 16, 2000 at 17:45:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 16, 2000 at 17:25:09, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:43:12, Amir Ban wrote: >>> >>>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:06:03, Amir Ban wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>This game is not over. There are major communication problems at the >>>>>KasparovChess offices. The game has been stopped, and there are discussions >>>>>going on on what to do next. >>>>> >>>>>Needless to say, this is not making me happy. Apologies to all viewers. >>>>> >>>>>Amir >>>> >>>>It has been agreed with GM Adams to call game one a DRAW. >>>> >>>>The second game will start in about 20 minutes. Communication looks good at this >>>>moment. Let's hope we can play the second game to finish :( >>>> >>>>Amir >>> >>>GM Adams has now changed his mind and wants the entire 2-game match to be >>>declared his win by forfeit. >>> >>>Amir >> >> >>was there any pre-tournament discussion about communication disasters like >>this? IE it would be prudent to _always_ have a plan, as anything can happen >>when the internet passes thru so many points between A and B... > >Found this on the Kasparov site. Does not address particulars but the spirit of >mutual cooperation and professionalism is evident. > >MATCH ARBITERS > >In order to ensure that this groundbreaking event is a successful one, the role >of the match arbiter cannot be understated. According to KasparovChess Grand >Prix Event Coordinator Aviv Bushinsky, ?the role must be clearly defined so that >the matches are conducted in a completely fair and supervised fashion.? > >For this purpose each player has been assigned an arbiter whose neutrality, >impartiality and sense of fair play is beyond question. The arbiter must >coordinate proceedings with the players and arrive at least 15 minutes before >the commencement of the game. If both arbiters are not present the games will >not begin. Bushinsky stresses the importance of a professional atmosphere being >maintained both for the players and for the spectators. > >The arbiter must make certain the player is not be subjected to any external >interference and to this effect he must neither be disturbed nor assisted during >the game. The player must not discuss the game with anyone throughout the match >and he must not use any external material such as chess books or chess software. > >In addition the arbiter will be required to help record this historic event by >writing a match report summary including the players? post game comments. > This shows an _incredible_ level of "network incompetence". The _first_ question that needed answering was "what do we do if we have a serious network problem on either (or both) ends while a game is in progress?" When we were discussing the ICC tournament, this was the _first_ issue discussed. Because the internet is not reliable. Small countries like Israel have serious drawbacks as they don't have the hundreds of internet connect pathways we have in North America (for example). Someone _must_ figure out what to do in case such a problem occurs... and they _must_ figure this out _before_ the event, not with a bunch of wild hair-pulling after the problem occurs in a critical game. This was ridiculous. The people making the decision ought to be raked over the coals for such a ridiculous happening. And the person that made the decision to forfeit Junior ought to be taken out back and beaten with a mop handle. :) And we wonder if there will be more computer-allowed events? right... >> >>I think the draw in game 1 was overkill, as I think you could have won. His >>wanting to call the entire match a win is _really_ over the edge and ought to >>be turned down. Unless there was something agreed to prior to the match. He >>has already had enough "charity" IMHO. He should have zero right now after >>1 game, not .5. It seems ridiculous to give him 2.0
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.