Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:05:24 02/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2000 at 17:13:52, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >If you are talking about chess as rules and moves, then it is obviously not >physical. I can replay a game that Lasker played 100 years ago. There's no >physical connection there. > >If your only point is that chess players are goverened by quantum mechanics, >then you're right. But that's just abusing a buzzword. I can just as easily say >that chess players are goverened by chemistry, conservation of energy, or the >impressive-sounding special relativity. But who cares? So is everything else in >the universe. You're not adding any value to anything. You're just using some >Star Trek words to make your arguments sound deep. I find that very aggravating. you don't see the point. i resign. you win. maybe i have read to many books, and you have seen to much star wars. >-Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.