Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 14:01:00 02/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2000 at 13:23:45, Simon Finn wrote: >On February 22, 2000 at 23:45:32, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>On February 22, 2000 at 22:24:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On February 22, 2000 at 21:16:39, Paulo Soares wrote: >>(snip) >> >>>>1...b2+ 2.Kc2 exf4 3.Bxc3 f3 4.Be1 Kd4 5.Bh4 b1B+ 6.Kxb1 Kxe4 7.Bf2 Kd3 8.h4 Ke2 >>>>9.Bd4 h6 10.Bg1 f2 >>>> ยต (-0.95) depth: 25 00:14:01 231242kN >>> >>>Actually, I am surprised (but not that it was Junior). However, you can see >>>that Junior does not know it is a good move yet. Junior thinks that it is down >>>one pawn instead of going to win. So it picked the right move, but it does not >>>know why yet. >> >>Yes, if you place the number as your absolute reference, Junior has only 1 >>advantage pawn. But, and now I remember some words of Thorsten Czub, other >>important references exist in these analyses of Junior6: >> >>1. The presented pv is winner, that is to say, none moves done >> for Junior allows the blacks to draw the game. > >Are you sure? Under-promoting to a bishop looks risky. > >Can Black really win after 6. Kd2(!) ? > >[D] 8/7p/6p1/8/3kP1PB/5p1P/3K4/1b6 b - - 0 1 > > >>2. That's no initial move that can to substitute 1 ...b2. >> >>These 2 observations, take me to end that the given evaluation >>by Junior in this position (1 pawn), doesn't have the dimension >>that seems to have. >> >>Paulo Soares, from Brazil > >Simon You are right. Only now I saw that Junior6 promoted the pawn to bishop. Junior6 analyzed the position again and the pv it's the same. I find strange this bad promotion. Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.