Author: Simon Finn
Date: 10:23:45 02/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2000 at 23:45:32, Paulo Soares wrote: >On February 22, 2000 at 22:24:56, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On February 22, 2000 at 21:16:39, Paulo Soares wrote: >(snip) > >>>1...b2+ 2.Kc2 exf4 3.Bxc3 f3 4.Be1 Kd4 5.Bh4 b1B+ 6.Kxb1 Kxe4 7.Bf2 Kd3 8.h4 Ke2 >>>9.Bd4 h6 10.Bg1 f2 >>> ยต (-0.95) depth: 25 00:14:01 231242kN >> >>Actually, I am surprised (but not that it was Junior). However, you can see >>that Junior does not know it is a good move yet. Junior thinks that it is down >>one pawn instead of going to win. So it picked the right move, but it does not >>know why yet. > >Yes, if you place the number as your absolute reference, Junior has only 1 >advantage pawn. But, and now I remember some words of Thorsten Czub, other >important references exist in these analyses of Junior6: > >1. The presented pv is winner, that is to say, none moves done > for Junior allows the blacks to draw the game. Are you sure? Under-promoting to a bishop looks risky. Can Black really win after 6. Kd2(!) ? [D] 8/7p/6p1/8/3kP1PB/5p1P/3K4/1b6 b - - 0 1 >2. That's no initial move that can to substitute 1 ...b2. > >These 2 observations, take me to end that the given evaluation >by Junior in this position (1 pawn), doesn't have the dimension >that seems to have. > >Paulo Soares, from Brazil Simon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.