Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 20:45:32 02/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2000 at 22:24:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 22, 2000 at 21:16:39, Paulo Soares wrote: (snip) >>1...b2+ 2.Kc2 exf4 3.Bxc3 f3 4.Be1 Kd4 5.Bh4 b1B+ 6.Kxb1 Kxe4 7.Bf2 Kd3 8.h4 Ke2 >>9.Bd4 h6 10.Bg1 f2 >> ยต (-0.95) depth: 25 00:14:01 231242kN > >Actually, I am surprised (but not that it was Junior). However, you can see >that Junior does not know it is a good move yet. Junior thinks that it is down >one pawn instead of going to win. So it picked the right move, but it does not >know why yet. Yes, if you place the number as your absolute reference, Junior has only 1 advantage pawn. But, and now I remember some words of Thorsten Czub, other important references exist in these analyses of Junior6: 1. The presented pv is winner, that is to say, none moves done for Junior allows the blacks to draw the game. 2. That's no initial move that can to substitute 1 ...b2. These 2 observations, take me to end that the given evaluation by Junior in this position (1 pawn), doesn't have the dimension that seems to have. Paulo Soares, from Brazil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.