Author: Howard Exner
Date: 21:56:56 02/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2000 at 18:27:18, Terry Presgrove wrote:
>On February 24, 2000 at 17:59:19, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>
>>On February 24, 2000 at 17:29:03, Terry Presgrove wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The position does raise an interesting question as to whether 27. Bg2
>>> saves the game for white? I spent more than an hour looking at the position
>>> with Fritz6, Rebel-tiger and LG2000V2 and could not find a win for black.
>>
>>26... Re3! 27. 27.Bg2 Rxg3! 28.fxg3? (28.e3! is much stronger, but Black still
>>has sufficient compensation for the sacrificed material), Kasparov dixit.
>>
>>Enrique
>>
>>> TP
>
> Hi Enrique,
>
> The best I could come up with was 26...Re8-e3 27.Bh1–g2 Re3xg3 28.e2-e3 Qc7-e5
>29.Qc4-f1 Nd5xe3 30.f2xe3 Qe5xe3+ 31.Qf1–f2 Qe3-a3 32.Nd4-b3 Rg3xb3 8.Nc5xb3
>Qa3xb3 =
Here is what GM Spraggett came up with in a 1993 article. His find was that
after 6 decades, analysts of this position, including Alekhine and Reti,
must have missed the move 10. f4 (see below).
1... Re3 2. Bf3 Bxf3 3. exf3 cxb5 4. Nxb5 Qa5 5. Rxd5 Re1+ 6. Rxe1 Qxe1+
7. Kg2 Ra1 {In his notes Alekhine made the claim here that white "will lose
immediately" if following this line. Spraggett showed otherwise} 8. Rd8+ Kh7 9.
Qh4+ Kg6 10. f4 Qf1+ 11. Kf3 Qxb5 12. Qg5+ Kh7
13. Qf5+ g6 14. Qxf6
Spraggett's recommendation for Black was 7 ... Nxd5 8. Qxd5 Ra1 = and that
overall 1. ... Re3 was a good move in a difficult position. I guess it proved
too difficult for Reti to find the best defense.
Probably computers will spot the flaw in 7. ... Ra1 rather quickly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.