Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 01:16:41 03/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2000 at 04:10:57, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On March 16, 2000 at 14:29:21, Robin Smith wrote: > >>On March 16, 2000 at 03:09:17, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On March 15, 2000 at 14:17:59, Robin Smith wrote: >>> >>>>In the 13th US correspondence chess championship finals I played a move that my >>>>computer NEVER finds. Do any programs find 17.... Qd5! >>> >>>I haven't seen it come out on top as a program's first choice, but the programs >>>I tried seem to realize that it is playable. Modern programs know that the >>>wandering king and the blocked-off queen spell big trouble for White. They >>>don't even play Nb6, preferring moves like Ne3 to try to give the White king a >>>smidgen of protection or two. ;-) Perhaps your opponent consulted with an >>>somewhat older program? >> >>I think that Ne3 would allow white to play on longer than Nb6, but the game >>would still be lost. My opponent probably realized as much. His resignation >>included the comment "I gambled and I lost". >> >>This game was concluded back in December, so my opponent, if he was consulting a >>computer, could not have been using any of the latest programs that have come >>out recently. >> >>> >>>Dave > >Deep Junior thinks that Ne3 or f3 should have been played earlier too, like >instead of Qa4. It still thinks Black has a great position, even after these >moves. When I meant an older program, I mean one that is several (e.g. 5) years >old. > >Pretty big gamble! (I thought people didn't do that in correspondence chess, it >sounds very risky.) > >Dave Just saw Dann's analysis with Crafty... Crafty didn't do so well. Maybe any helper program was newer than I thought. :/ Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.