Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Branching factor, make me confuse more that ever.

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 21:44:28 04/04/00

Go up one level in this thread

On April 04, 2000 at 23:13:08, leonid wrote:

>WAC, BK, BT2xxx - what it is?

Test suites. WAC is the essential one. You can get that from any number of
places. I suggest searching for them on the web.

>I can't say nothing about GNU, Crafty and so like since I don't know how to find
>their core logic speed when we speek about "positional move". If you speak about
>finding mate then mine should lead or be between the leading at least.

I'm not talking about speed. The most straightforward way to compare chess
programs is by having them play chess against each other. If you play a game
between your program and Crafty, how well does your program do?

>When I tried my "raw speed" of "positional logic" against games such as Genius
>4, Hiarcs 7.32 and Rebel 10 (if there are just no some extra mistakes that are
>all the time possible) mine begin loosing in time only starting with ply 10.
>Since I have the impression that mine loose around 8 or ten times speed before
>it reach 10 ply deep search (positional logic) I am so eager to know where mine
>goes wrong.

I can't understand what you're saying here.


This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.