Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:38:16 04/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2000 at 14:39:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 09, 2000 at 10:45:36, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >> >> >>On April 09, 2000 at 02:44:22, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On April 08, 2000 at 13:02:56, Daniel Chancey wrote: >>> >>>>How about we compare the Deep Blue games with the Fritz 6 games. also compare >>>>Kasparov's games. Who's better? >>>> >>>>Castle2000 >>> >>>We don't have enough DB games for an intelligent comparison. >>> >>>-Tom >>in the few games db has played it has made major positional mistakes >>though, especially building up after opening. Now no program plays >>that stage perfect, but the mistakes that db has made even a >>very small IM could have at least drawn or won that against DB, >>a single mistake doesn't lose a game, but making 4 to 6 bad moves >>a game usual lose a game, especially against IMs that fight you in >>a (half)closed position. >> >>In important games i make LESS than 4 mistakes a game. >> >>Vincent > > >Maybe so. But no matter how "many" DB made, it _won_. That is the difference >between you and DB. And if it wins, then maybe they aren't "mistakes" after >all... It's worth knowing something about human nature. Even the biggest person can fall very far as a result of just a little pride. You can't say that just because it is the great Kasparov making the moves, therefore it's divine. We all know how Kasparov scorns computers, and that causes him to relax alot of his better senses, and it's no surprise if at times he might even drop to below master-level awareness. Genius though he may be, IMHO he is still a person who has problems with self awareness. He may be a better actor than he used to be. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.