Author: Chessfun
Date: 23:50:22 05/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2000 at 02:18:11, Mogens Larsen wrote: >When you post there's problems with the results, learning, chessbase GUI and >autoplayer and still continue to reach conclusions about strength, you're wrong. I started posting problems with the 5/0 results. I reached no conclusion at that point. Please point me to a post I made after that which states any conclusions. Then when you find none your wrong. However this is another new subject the subject in hand was you posting the statement: "The might is very, very big, especially if there's a lot of shenanigan's going on with the testing." This statement was all I was interested in your opinions on testing you are entitled to and I see little point in arguing about it. >When you make a special test, where you select the parameters, you can't draw >general conclusion to the playing strength. That isn't my opinion, that's a >fact. I made no special test. Nunn 1 has been around long enough. The only parameters selected are pondering which if you are familiar with the F6 or J6 should be OFF on one pc. And is how Jouni played his games, which resulted in me starting mine. And it is your opinion, not a fact. As I can draw _general_ conclusions to the playing strength of any engine for whatever reason I choose even if that reason makes no sense to you. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.