Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: the right to protest in a sensational way

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 15:22:39 05/10/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 10, 2000 at 15:03:31, Paolo Casaschi wrote:

>IMHO,
>
>if a tournament organizer has the right to attract the attention on
>his tournament by doing silly things (e.g. inviting a computer to play
>in a national championship),
>then the chessplayers have the right to protest in a sensational way,
>as they think is more appropriate to drag attention. In the end, they
>have the right to say their own word on the futire of their profession.
>
>Of course, resigning in 4 moves or playing silly and losing in few more
>moves is not really "professional"  as simply refusing to play at all,
>but why the players should behave better than organizers?
>
>In the end everybody is happy:
>- the players get more attention on their protest
>- the organizers get more attention on the event (and columns on newspapers)
>
>Then, who should be unhappy?

We are.
F.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.