Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 10:29:57 10/22/97
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 1997 at 13:20:08, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On October 22, 1997 at 09:55:03, Chris Whittington wrote: > >>I expected a few p2 300's. Don't really approve, but their advantage is >>not going to be 3.5 x as with liquid nitrogen cooled alphas, is it ? > >Good question. I have no idea what the difference is between a K6/233 >and a PII/300. > >I can give you some hard number for Alpha, but not for a 767 mhz Alpha. > >With my program, running an Enorex 500 mhz Alpha (1mb cache), it appears >that the Alpha is 1.5x faster than my P6/200. This is based upon a run >of the LCTI test at 210 seconds per position (98 minutes total). > >Running on a Polywell 533 mhz Alpha (2mb cache), mine goes 1.75x faster >than my P6/200, based upon the same test. > >I have heard that a K6/233 is faster than a P6/200. > Who has got numbers for P2 200 -> P2 300 ? Chris >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.