Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 12:55:43 05/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 2000 at 14:53:44, ujecrh wrote: >Of course I won't and we can probably still find some games where the human >player gets the advantage because he finds a way out of the book where the >computer can not handle this because of a lack of opening knowledge. But, even >if that was usual some years ago (remember Kasparov player e3 the first time >against Fritz) is becomes more and more difficult to find because books are >improving too. I don't really like to see moves like a3 or e3 to confuse a computer book, because there are other options. You can use quiet lines, by human standards, or lines where the computer has problems calculating what to do. Van der Wiel said that the biggest mistake a human can make, is to attempt to play chess against a computer chess program. With the Dutch championships in mind, I tend to think he's right. >I would like to see more opening knowledge in programs too. I could be very interesting to see, if it's possible to implement opening knowledge without hurting the general performance of the chess program itself. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.