Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WMCCC next year

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:58:45 11/07/97

Go up one level in this thread


I have two comments about the tournament:

1.  No outside communication is a stupid mistake to make.  And it was
not
just this year's "problem of the week" either.  There was *no*
information
flowing out of Jakarta in a timely fashion either, except there were
machines on the internet handy where I could get email information and
then
post it.

The ICCA needs to figure out that this is not just for the participants
that
are present, but it is also an event for the participants that are not
present, and also for the folks that are simply interested in computer
chess
in general.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to set up a modem connection.  I gave
a
demo in Paris a few years back with Cray Blitz, and my local radio shack
sold me every connector I needed.  Same thing for the Levy match in 1984
where we brought our own terminal and modem.  It does require that
someone
ask rather than stumbling into the playing hall sight unseen.  But it is
clearly doable.

As I said before, if I were running a business and asked one of my
employees
to set up a communication link for something this important, and he let
it
fall apart like this did, I'd simply fire him on the spot and find
someone that
was capable of doing it right the next time.  Again, this is *not*
rocket
science.

2.  A few TD decisions seemed oddball.  The initial two rounds that were
accelerated made no sense, and caused a few problems later on.  IE,
you'd
really like to see things decided near the end with the two leaders
slugging
it out, rather than having the two leaders play others because they had
already met earlier.  The explanations on this sort of pairing have
always
been quite clear, "they are appropriate when log2(n-players) is greater
than
the number of rounds."  That didn't fit this tournament at all, since 6
rounds
was more than enough to produce a clear winner, and there were 5 left
over for
good measure.

It didn't wreck anything, but simply seemed pointless.  And from some of
the
initial seedings, it actually hurt some a little.

Ah well, on to next year.  Hopefully someone will ride herd a little
more
carefully on the internet communication next year, and get information
*out*
in a timely manner, no matter where it is held.  Two consecutive years
of
little data (this year was much worse than last, but both were poor when
you
consider Aegon's live coverage on their web site) does not make for
happy
campers...



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.