Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz Has A New Weapon

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 09:25:18 08/30/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 30, 2000 at 11:48:04, Wayne Lowrance wrote:

>On August 30, 2000 at 10:40:36, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On August 30, 2000 at 09:45:45, Wayne Lowrance wrote:
>>
>>>On August 30, 2000 at 04:47:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 30, 2000 at 04:34:08, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On August 30, 2000 at 02:42:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On August 30, 2000 at 00:31:24, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On August 29, 2000 at 23:19:59, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On August 29, 2000 at 19:18:17, Alexander Kure wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On August 29, 2000 at 13:58:52, Graham Laight wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Firstly, apologies to everyone for dashing off after the last game in the WMCCC.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It enabled me to get an extra day's holiday with my girlfriend, though, which
>>>>>>>>>>was well worthwhile!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Well deserved, Graham!
>>>>>>>>>Thanks again for your work.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>[...]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>This game clearly showed that Fritz plays in a different league than Crafty! In
>>>>>>>>>fact I think this was one of the best games of the WMCCC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Greetings
>>>>>>>>>Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>My take on this game is a bit different.  I do _not_ want my program to make
>>>>>>>>such a sacrifice and then see the eval steadily go _down_ over the next few
>>>>>>>>moves.  It means one of two things for it to win such a game:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>1.  The eval is bogus.  It is saying "this is bad" when in reality "this is
>>>>>>>>good".  I don't want that sort of evaluation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But this is unavoidable. Otherwise computer programs would only need to do a 1
>>>>>>>ply search.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>2.  The program was lucky.  A little luck doesn't hurt.  But it doesn't win
>>>>>>>>tournaments very often.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Again, unavoidable. Have crafty play against itself and you will still have
>>>>>>>decisive games. The games are won due to luck, since they have the same eval.
>>>>>>>The question is, "did Fritz make a good gamble?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Either the eval was wrong, or it was lucky.  Neither one leave me feeling like
>>>>>>>>"fritz is in a different league than Crafty..."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Of course, but that is pretty much how _all_ games are decided isn't it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There are games when one side get advantage and slowly increase the advantage
>>>>>>without having a worse position.
>>>>>
>>>>>The only truly correct evals are a: win, draw or loss. The other stuff in
>>>>>between are _practical_ assessments that do not correspond to the true
>>>>>evaluation of the position, but they are precisely what all programs rely on in
>>>>>all games. Yes?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I suspect white has better moves that might have justified the pessimistic eval
>>>>>>>>Fritz had...  The right program might have made that sacrifice look as ugly as
>>>>>>>>this game made it look brilliant...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Better moves may exist, but you have to _find_ them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Crafty could find Nxe6.
>>>>>
>>>>>If Nxe6 is an improvement for crafty, it had to find it during the game and not
>>>>>after. Why it didn't is irrelevant to the result. The result still stands.
>>>>
>>>>The result stands but the impression that fritz is a different league than
>>>>crafty does not stand.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>I have both programs. It stands, has been that way for a long time ! Fritz found
>>>a move that Crafty could not find an answer for, all of the other stuff is
>>>excuse making !
>>>Wayne
>>
>>
>>I'm not trying to make _any_ excuses.  Crafty lost.  That happens.  The issue
>>(to me, now) is simply "did it _have_ to lose that game, was the sac sound,
>>if not, why didn't it find the right response?"
>>
>>I always analyze losses to see what went wrong, otherwise there would be no
>>way to make it play better.  There are two ideas here:  (1) if it should have
>>found Nxe6 but didn't, then that changes things a lot.  IE it shouldn't have
>>lost but did due to operator error, my error, or a programming problem.  (2) if
>>it couldn't find Nxe6 on the hardware it had, period, then the discussion is
>>now not about Crafty, but about Fritz, since it played a bad move but the
>>opponent didn't punish it correctly.  In that case, Fritz needs some tuning as
>>it won't always get away with playing such a sac.  There is no sense in a
>>program impaling itself on its own sword...
>
>I apoligize, I should not have said excuse making. I have over reacted. I think
>bias had set in as Fritz is my favourite program.
>
>Wayne


Nothing wrong with that bias.  I believe that Fritz is the best of the best,
and has been for several years...

IMHO of course..



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.