Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 15:25:11 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 12:05:06, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 09, 2000 at 07:33:22, pavel wrote: > >>dun forget IMO... > >I didn't. > >>I agree those are results limited to my machine... >>so whats your opinion about gandalf playing strength? ...lets here it from you. >>:) > >Difficult to say with precision. I think that the rating calculated by Frank Q. >is quite accurate concerning WinBoard, ie. around 2600. This varies with >timecontrol. The results by Christian Koch and Frank Quisinsky suggests that >Gandalf is the strongest WinBoard engine when it comes to standard and quite >strong at blitz too. > >http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?131333 (blitz results) > >The rating under CB GUI is slightly lower because it's not a native engine, even >though the implementation isn't too shabby. A native version would be >interesting. > >>IMO, IMO, IMO, IMO , IMO.......... > >That doesn't make you immune to critiscism. If you just want to watch your >opinion on print use a diary. > >>hmmm, arent you the the one who posted in winboard forum, results of few games >>by program X, against other programs and went in to conclusion that "this" >>engine is better (or worse) than "that" engine? > >No. > >>yes there is not enough games, and also sometimes you have to go through the >>games, not just, >> "play the games, see the results and jump in to conclusions" >> >>yes I am pathetic, >>my speculations are pathetic > >No, just your speculations given the data you have in your possession. > >>"you are god" (always right) > >Yes, I and don't even rest on Sunday's :o). > >Mogens. Hi! Why do you believe it's weaker under the CB GUI? Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.