Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:39:21 12/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
>I think you misunderstand what we wrote. Of course the learner-option Right. Learning function that works is passive defense against active cooked lines of opponents ! I have nothing against this. But putting a mass of deep lines in a book that were produced at home with autoplaying against the commercial enemy-versions is nothing passive. This is an attack and increases the tug-of-war. >is not the point, we were talking about cooked lines. In reaction on a >posting by Thorsten, who found out in a game MCP versus Hiarcs that >MCP played 37 moves of 'theory' and left the book with a +4 score. > >THAT is a development I dislike. Right. I know that the learning function of Mchess6 was not that brilliant. So what shall i have in marty programming a better one in mchess7. But the cooked lines are the problem. > >Regards, Jeroen
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.