Author: pavel
Date: 10:04:13 10/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2000 at 12:23:08, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 27, 2000 at 10:57:51, pavel wrote: > >>they did, several beta-testers. > >No Gandalf beta testers. > >>including the one I meet in chess.net, he was a beta tester for chessbase but >>still he said, for sure, that gandalf was better than fritz6a. > >That's his problem. Quite a few people still believe that Elvis is alive. > >>I belive I saw Frank Q saying (or rather typing it) it, >>and several others, can't remember who. > >No, that is not true. most likely. I dont remember how or where it started but it started with some people commenting about gandalf being (slightly) better than fritz6a. better or not is not the question, the question is it is based on this statement or assumption or opinions or whatever one might say that few people started testing gandalf vs fritz6 on long time controls, He was hoping that Gandalf would be closer at longer >timecontrols, which proved to be true. His estimate after the beta testing >period was difference of 50 elo. You can ask him yourself if you don't believe >me or alternatively read the newsticker. I have no reason not to believe you... > >He thought that Gandalf was one of the best engines for analysis due to its >testscores. There's a difference. 'best or not' it is still the best winboard engine .....:) > >Mogens. Pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.