Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: all time greats

Author: Jason Williamson

Date: 23:55:49 11/03/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 03, 2000 at 23:04:42, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On November 03, 2000 at 20:59:47, Peter Skinner wrote:
>
>>On November 03, 2000 at 19:46:32, walter irvin wrote:
>>
>>>On November 03, 2000 at 19:43:58, walter irvin wrote:
>>>
>>>>there may never be a way to know, but if there was a list of great chess
>>>>programs by elo ratings .mainframes ,pc's all put together .what would be the
>>>>top ten programs of all time .here is my list,not in any order.
>>>>deeper blue
>>>>deep junior
>>>>cray blitz
>>>>crafty 17.13 smp
>>>>deep shredder
>>>>gamit tiger
>>>>fritz 7
>>>>century 3
>>>>hiarcs 7.32
>>>i left out  the king cm8000 how could i for get the king??
>>>>the single processor programs run on 1 gig athlon
>>>>the deep pc's and crafty on 8 way box
>>>>
>>>>i think with that type of hardware the ave elo would be 2700+ if you include
>>>>deeper blue who's elo was over 2800
>>
>>When I think of all-time great programs, I think of the ones that got us to
>>where we are today. Not today's programs.
>>
>>For one to be considered an all-time great in football or baseball, they are
>>considered past their prime, and no way to competeing in today's game.
>>
>>Do you really think that Walter Payton could sustain the type hits given out by
>>today's football players? Not i think not.. just roll out the stretcher..
>>
>>When I think of the all-time great programs, I think of DeepBlue, DeepThought,
>>Cray-Blitz, Sargon, GNUChess, MChess, Genius, and the list goes on.
>>
>>Todays programs have only proven that they are better than the others due to
>>hardware, and the programming knowledge learned from the earlier programs.
>>
>>Boxing would have been no where if it were not for the likes of Ali, Foreman,
>>Chavez, and Fraizer.
>>
>>Don't you agree?
>
>
>
>By your definition I would say that Richard Lang's programs between 1985 and
>1992 are the all time greats.
>
>They are still an incredible challenge to many amateur programs.
>
>
>
>    Christophe

I agree with you there in so far as you don't consider the big iron machines of
the 80s.  Richard Lang's programs where quite amazing.

JW




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.