Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 14:31:50 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
Hi T: It is not so simple as you put it: or they count all or they count nothing. Somewhere some kind of stop must be putted in any kind of election or process. If not, if you have not a legal limit but try to validate a factual limit, then you always can say than in Dodge city there are three ladies that were sick and it is neccesary to wait what they think. Or that in Aspen, Colorado, 123 people went home because they tired to wait in the quee. Etc. So a limit must me imposed -even somewhat arbitrary in date- and in fact it is so in every part of the world. What makes of a country a democratic one is not the perfection of the process of counting every posible vote without no room for mistakes, delays, etc, but the chance for everyone to go to vote. Besides we are talking of 99,999% of votes currently counted: how you can say that the remain - .0001- is enough to say there is no democracy? Democracy has to do with the will of the mass of the people decently expresed in a general mechanism subjected to pitfalls, not with the sum of the will of every possible human entity. Your argument is correct only in cases where the difference between mass of voters and mass of votes counted is dramatic.It is not the case. What makes the issue seems dramatic is just the mathematic of the result AND the mechanic of the electoral college. But then we could speak of a different problem: not democracy or not, but a good electoral mechanism or not. Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.