Author: Mike S.
Date: 08:42:04 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 11:05:41, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On November 19, 2000 at 10:25:21, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote: > >>There has been some discussion here about holding some >>"exhibition" variations on the Turing test. >>This must be done eventually. >>If successful, it would be epoch-making. >>I think the year 2001 is fantastically apropo, >>promotionally speaking! > >I don't think any of the top computer programs can come close to passing a >turing test. (...) > >I would not be surprised if the CCC membership could easily devise a test >consisting of 10 positions, which virtually any strong human would solve 10 of >10 and the top programs would solve 0 of 10. Probably possible, but this would not be a Turing test (at least not compliant to the definition I remember). A it was just discussed below, referring to an announcement of Ed Schröder regarding computer games against GM v.d.Wiel, this would be a test by watching a game (live or afterwards) without knowing which of the players if the human and which one is the computer. It would indeed be interesting to see, if chess experts can determine this... Did computerchess catch up with science fiction in this respect? As Hermano indicates by *2001*, playing chess like HAL is different than "just" playing very strong like i.e. Deep Blue: http://mitpress.mit.edu/e-books/Hal/chap5.java/five1.html Regards, M.Scheidl P.S. If someone wants to try it: http://x56.deja.com/=dnc/getdoc.xp?AN=657997698&CONTEXT=974605131.1065680911&hitnum=0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.