Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 10:30:33 01/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2001 at 08:30:10, Sylvain Renard wrote: >On January 05, 2001 at 02:03:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 04, 2001 at 22:26:49, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On January 04, 2001 at 18:36:15, Joshua Lee wrote: >>> >>>>21.Nf3 Bc6 22.Nh4 g5 23.Ng6+ Kh7 24.Nxf8+ Rxf8 25.Bxe6 Bd7 >>>> ± (1.06) Depth: 19/47 19:04:48 42992526kN >>>>21.e5 >>>> ± (1.09) Depth: 19/47 21:54:31 49601048kN >>>>21.e5 dxe5 22.Ne4 Nh5 23.Qg4 Nf4 24.Nf3 Qc7 25.Nh4 Bc6 >>>> ± (1.31) Depth: 19/50 26:22:52 60316211kN >>>> >>>>(Lee, Pensacola,Fl 04.01.2001) >>>>System 800Mhz Athlon 256Mb pc-133 128MBHT >>>> >>I think that the line is not correct and I guess that 23.Qg6 is the right move. >>It is interesting to know how much time do programs need to find 23.Qg6 and how >>much time do they need to see a winning score for this move(I assume that 22.Ne4 >>Uri > > Hello, >in the french review GAMBISCO, n°48 july 1994, Pierre Nolot wrote >that this test will be the first to be found, some years later. >He was right! >Spassky played 23.Qg6, but Pierre thought that 23.Qg4!! (Nolot's comment) >was better! > Best regards, > Sylvain Many of the positions have been solved for years, I believe including this one. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.