Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I'm wrong about 10-0 vs 60-40

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:28:03 02/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On February 04, 2001 at 12:48:36, Walter Koroljow wrote:

>On February 03, 2001 at 18:58:36, Uri Blass wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>Assume level of confidence 97% in all of your tests.
>>
>>If you reject H0 in 3% of the times then it is possible that you are always
>>wrong when you reject H0(for example when always We=0.5).
>>
>>If you reject H0 in 50% of the times then you are wrong only in at most 6% of
>>the cases that you reject H0(to be more exact I need to say if the probability
>>to reject H0 is 50% but the probability is something that you do not know and
>>the % of the cases that you rejected H0 practically is something that you know).
>>
>>Uri
>
>If I interpret you correctly, I disagree.  Let us work at the 97% confidence
>level with H0 as before.
>
>We agree that the highest Type I error rate (false rejection of H0) occurs if,
>for each test we run, we have We = 0.5.  In fact the error rate will be exactly
>3% then.  If We = 0.8, the error rate will be less -- assume 1% for convenience.
> Let me make my case by example.
>
>Suppose that in the population that we test repeatedly we have:
>
>34% We = 0.5 (H0 true)
>33% We = 0.8 (H0 true)
>33% We = 0.2 (H0 false).
>
>Then the Type I error rate for the case H0 true is (.34*3% +.33*1%)/(.34+.33) =
>2.01%
>This is less than 3%.  I cannot see how the error rate could ever exceed 3% for
>any mix of We.
>
>For the case We = 0.2, a Type I error is impossible since H0 is false.  So the
>overall Type I error rate
>will be:
>
>(.34*3% + .33*1% + .33*0%)/(.34+.33+.33) = 1.35%, of course also less than 3%.

Basically I guess that we agree and there is some misunderstanding in the
language

I will try to explain it more clearly only by math.

From my post:
"If you reject H0 in 3% of the times then it is possible that you are always
wrong when you reject H0(for example when always We=0.5)."

Explanation:

If P(You reject H0)=0.03 then it is possible that
p(you are wrong| you reject H0)=1.


From my post:
"If you reject H0 in 50% of the times then you are wrong only in at most 6% of
the cases that you reject H0(to be more exact I need to say if the probability
to reject H0 is 50% but the probability is something that you do not know and
the % of the cases that you rejected H0 practically is something that you
know)".

Explanation:

If p(You reject H0)=0.5 then
p(you are wrong| you reject H0)<=0.06

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.