Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Positional test - Paralyzing the Knight

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:19:12 02/28/01

Go up one level in this thread


On February 28, 2001 at 13:48:00, Sune Larsson wrote:

>On February 28, 2001 at 13:00:53, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On February 28, 2001 at 11:12:09, Sune Larsson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  [D]4n3/1b3k1p/p2p2p1/3Pp3/2P3P1/6PP/2BB4/6K1 w - - 0 1
>>>
>>>  This is Hort-Ciocaltea, Budapest 1973. Only two moves are required
>>>  to immobilize the black knight and pave the way for the victorious
>>>  march of the white king to the deserted queenside:
>>>
>>>  1.g5! Bc8 2.g4! and black's position is ripe for resignation.
>>>
>>>  Test: The above move order should be rewarded with big +scores for white.
>>>
>>>  Sune
>>
>>
>>There may be more than one winning plan here.  Crafty thinks that Ba5 wins a
>>pawn, for example...  eval = +1.26 after 18 plies, almost 2 minutes:
>>
>>               17     1:01   0.99   1. Ba5 Ke7 2. Kf2 Bc8 3. Kf3 Bd7 4.
>>                                    Ke4 Kf6 5. Bb4 Nb6 6. Bd3 Nc8 7. c5
>>                                    dxc5 8. Bxc5 a5 9. d6
>>               17->   1:09   0.99   1. Ba5 Ke7 2. Kf2 Bc8 3. Kf3 Bd7 4.
>>                                    Ke4 Kf6 5. Bb4 Nb6 6. Bd3 Nc8 7. c5
>>                                    dxc5 8. Bxc5 a5 9. d6
>>               18     1:40   1.26   1. Ba5 Ke7 2. Kf2 Bc8 3. Kf3 Bd7 4.
>>                                    Ke4 Kf6 5. Bb3 h5 6. Bb4 hxg4 7. hxg4
>>                                    Ke7 8. c5 dxc5 9. Bxc5+ Kf6 10. g5+
>>                                    Kxg5 11. Kxe5
>>               18->   1:53   1.26   1. Ba5 Ke7 2. Kf2 Bc8 3. Kf3 Bd7 4.
>>                                    Ke4 Kf6 5. Bb3 h5 6. Bb4 hxg4 7. hxg4
>>                                    Ke7 8. c5 dxc5 9. Bxc5+ Kf6 10. g5+
>>                                    Kxg5 11. Kxe5
>
> Interesting line. Can Crafty win the above position after 11.-Kg4?
>
> Sune


Good question.  A brief note about chess programs.  When they produce a PV
as above, the first move is the one they play.  The second move is the one
they expect, but it is less accurate as it is the result of a search that is
one ply shallower than the search to choose the _first_ move.  By the time
you reach the end of the PV, it is _highly_ likely that those moves will never
be played in a real game.  The last move is based on a 1 ply search, for
example, and no one would consider that to be reasonable chess...


IE when a GM gives me a variation to look at, _every_ move generally is
a sound move.  When  a computer gives me a variation, the deeper the move
in the variation, the less likely it is to be the best move.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.