Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 09:01:11 03/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2001 at 11:32:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 18, 2001 at 09:51:09, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>On March 18, 2001 at 08:37:06, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On March 17, 2001 at 17:47:40, Sune Larsson wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> [D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p2p1/p2R4/1r6/1P4P1/P3PP1P/R5K1 b - - 0 1 >>>> >>>> >>>> This is a position from the game IM Giardelli-GM Andersson, Argentine 2001. >>>> It was previously posted, with some comments, under "Testposition - Double >>>> Rook ending." Andersson won this game in a convincing style. Voices were >>>> heard that Fritz might have done better than Giardelli. That arouse my >>>> curiosity, so I decided to give it a go. >>>> >>>> PIII 800, 128Mb Hash, 3-4 and some 5 men TB:s (not KPPKR...;) >>>> The whole game, from the above position, in 1 hour each. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Deep Fritz - Larsson >>>>Rook ending 60'. KIL, 17.03.2001 >>>> >>>> 128MB, Nz7book.ctg. PIII 800 >>>> 1...a4 2.bxa4 -0.28/15 1:49 Rc2 3.a5 -0.19/15 1:21 Rxe2 4.a4 -0.34/15 >>>>2:26 Re5 5.Rb5 -0.06/17 3:41 Rexb5 6.axb5 -0.06/18 0 Rxb5 7.a6 -0.09/17 >>>>1:18 Rb8 8.Kf1 (This position must be clearly won for black, but his play from >>>>now on is probably not exact.) -0.19/17 2:03 8...Kf8 9.Kg2 -0.59/16 1:16 >>>>Ke8 10.Kf3 -1.00/16 1:14 h6 11.Kg4 -1.06/16 2:01 Kd7 12.h4 -1.06/16 15 >>>>Kc6 13.f4 -0.97/16 1:09 Ra8 14.h5 -0.62/16 1:14 gxh5+ 15.Kxh5 -0.72/18 >>>>2:18 Kb5 16.Kxh6 -0.72/16 42 Rxa6 17.Rb1+ -0.75/15 1:22 Kc4 18.Kg7 >>>>-0.69/15 1:12 f6 19.g4 -0.22/14 42 d5 20.g5 0.00/16 1:00 fxg5 21.fxg5 >>>>0.00/15 48 e5 22.g6 0.00/15 49 d4 23.Rc1+ -0.56/15 2:29 Kd5 24.Kh7 >>>>-0.28/15 53 e4 25.g7 -0.53/15 47 Ra7 26.Ra1 -4.28/16 0 Rxg7+ 27.Kxg7 >>>>-6.47/17 47 e3 28.Ra5+ -6.91/15 44 Ke4 29.Kf6 -9.12/16 1:49 e2 30.Re5+ >>>>-9.34/14 30 Kf3 31.Rf5+ -9.19/13 1:31 Ke3 32.Re5+ -#28/13 15 Kd2 33.Rd5 >>>>-#26/10 0 d3 0-1 >>>> >>>>Sune >>> >>>Very good ! But it is hardly the same thing, playing over a position that you >>>have fully analyzed compared to playing it for the first time OTB now is it? >>>Jim >> >> Right, but Deep Fritz deviated very early from the game Giardelli-Andersson, >>with 1.-bxa4. So I really had no use of Andersson's play. After 7.a6 black's >>plan is very primitive: Just go get the a-pawn under good conditions. But it's >>very difficult to make things look so easy, as Ulf does. I simply cannot. >>No wonder...;) >> >>Sune > >I do not know if andersson could win Deep Fritz in a more convincing way. Yes, but I tend to be very self-critic about my own play. And I know my feelings during this game. I felt that it should be possible to put my 5 pawns in an optimal position before moving the king to the queenside. But I just couldn't figure out how and felt that I lost a whole lot of control. Maybe typical when a lot of knowledge patterns are missing...;) > >I believe that Deep Fritz is better than the IM who played against Ulf andersson >At least it can avoid tactical mistakes that the IM did. That's true - and it should at least be possible for white to reach a rook ending with 4 vs 5 pawns. Sune > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.